ELECTION DIRECTIVE
A little noted executive action, upheld by the Supreme Court by the way, was the firing of three of the four members of the U. S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC), an independent commission designed to assist state election officials with various issues that may come before them. The fourth member, a republican, resigned. The commission had two democrats and two republicans as would be the number insuring some form of nonpartisanship.
This is a good thing too! We need to build up our ability to contest any election where a democrat prevails. The last thing we want is a congress able to interfere with whatever our president wants to do, which is just about anything, if you know what I mean.
So let's face it. After contesting elections in 2020 without success since there was no evidence to support the allegations, we need to ensure that we can successfully contest any democratic victory without evidence now, in 2026. After all, you learn by experience.
We are already hearing that many elections will be rigged and the fact that they are all where democrats may win is simply coincidence. We are in the process of establishing coincidence as an evidentiary principle. There is absolutely no reason that one can not conclude that there is election interference if a democrat wins. It simply stands to reason and the overwhelming social media opinion supports this.
And one does not need other evidence when one has coincidence. This must be our guiding principle going forward. What adds credence to such a conclusion is the fact that our president and other high officials say it is so. I mean what more do you want than the president claiming election interference and democrats winning elections. The facts speak for themselves.
This presidential claim of omniscience in his projections of the rigged elections of 2026 and hence the preparations underway to combat election fraud wherever it appears a democrat is winning are simply necessary. Getting rid of a nonpartisan election commission was not only a good idea but also a requirement. Nonpartisanship is simply an impediment to proper election results.
The FBI and Department of Justice should be ready to instigate immediate investigations where democrats manage to get more ballots than the republican candidate and there should be serious discussion now of seizing ballot boxes where necessary. Intimidation would have an impact as one more tool in fighting rigged elections and may conceivably reduce the actual number of elections needing a different count.
So in closing, we must plan ahead which this administration is certainly doing. As mentioned above, a democratic congress would be a serious impediment to whatever it is our president would like to do next and he and his appointed officials will be making any effort to see that it doesn't happen, which I am most certain a vast number of the public supports. Besides, this democracy of ours is getting stale anyway and it may be time to ignore it altogether.
Richard E H Phelps II
Mingo
